Comments on: EMF on Devices http://aniszczyk.org/2007/05/02/emf-on-devices/ work. life. open source. diatribes. Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:01:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Peter Nehrer http://aniszczyk.org/2007/05/02/emf-on-devices/comment-page-1/#comment-293 Peter Nehrer Thu, 03 May 2007 19:44:00 +0000 http://aniszczyk.org/2007/05/02/emf-on-devices/#comment-293 Ed, that's really great! As far as I'm concerned, 2.2 is a great release even though it lacks support for the latest and greatest Java 5 features.<br/><br/>One area that will need to be pretty much ported over to eRCP is the UI layer. Having a full vertical EMF "stack" (from model to UI) would really bring the power of model-driven architecture to eRCP, with quite a small resource footprint at that. But that's probably more suited for a separate sub-project (emf4me? :-)) rather than being part of EMF proper. Ed, that’s really great! As far as I’m concerned, 2.2 is a great release even though it lacks support for the latest and greatest Java 5 features.

One area that will need to be pretty much ported over to eRCP is the UI layer. Having a full vertical EMF “stack” (from model to UI) would really bring the power of model-driven architecture to eRCP, with quite a small resource footprint at that. But that’s probably more suited for a separate sub-project (emf4me? :-) ) rather than being part of EMF proper.

]]> By: Peter Nehrer http://aniszczyk.org/2007/05/02/emf-on-devices/comment-page-1/#comment-2386 Peter Nehrer Thu, 03 May 2007 19:44:00 +0000 http://aniszczyk.org/2007/05/02/emf-on-devices/#comment-2386 Ed, that's really great! As far as I'm concerned, 2.2 is a great release even though it lacks support for the latest and greatest Java 5 features.One area that will need to be pretty much ported over to eRCP is the UI layer. Having a full vertical EMF "stack" (from model to UI) would really bring the power of model-driven architecture to eRCP, with quite a small resource footprint at that. But that's probably more suited for a separate sub-project (emf4me? :-)) rather than being part of EMF proper. Ed, that’s really great! As far as I’m concerned, 2.2 is a great release even though it lacks support for the latest and greatest Java 5 features.One area that will need to be pretty much ported over to eRCP is the UI layer. Having a full vertical EMF “stack” (from model to UI) would really bring the power of model-driven architecture to eRCP, with quite a small resource footprint at that. But that’s probably more suited for a separate sub-project (emf4me? :-) ) rather than being part of EMF proper.

]]> By: Ed Merks http://aniszczyk.org/2007/05/02/emf-on-devices/comment-page-1/#comment-292 Ed Merks Wed, 02 May 2007 20:40:00 +0000 http://aniszczyk.org/2007/05/02/emf-on-devices/#comment-292 As far as I know, there is no Profile 1.1 support for Java 5.0, so we can only do this for EMF 2.2.x not the new 2.3.0 stream. I'd like to make it happen for EMF 2.2.3, which will GA soon, so the pressure is on... As far as I know, there is no Profile 1.1 support for Java 5.0, so we can only do this for EMF 2.2.x not the new 2.3.0 stream. I’d like to make it happen for EMF 2.2.3, which will GA soon, so the pressure is on…

]]> By: Ed Merks http://aniszczyk.org/2007/05/02/emf-on-devices/comment-page-1/#comment-2385 Ed Merks Wed, 02 May 2007 20:40:00 +0000 http://aniszczyk.org/2007/05/02/emf-on-devices/#comment-2385 As far as I know, there is no Profile 1.1 support for Java 5.0, so we can only do this for EMF 2.2.x not the new 2.3.0 stream. I'd like to make it happen for EMF 2.2.3, which will GA soon, so the pressure is on... As far as I know, there is no Profile 1.1 support for Java 5.0, so we can only do this for EMF 2.2.x not the new 2.3.0 stream. I’d like to make it happen for EMF 2.2.3, which will GA soon, so the pressure is on…

]]>