<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Plug-in Development Workflow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aniszczyk.org/2007/12/30/plug-in-development-workflow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aniszczyk.org/2007/12/30/plug-in-development-workflow/</link>
	<description>work. life. open source. diatribes.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Aniszczyk (zx)</title>
		<link>http://aniszczyk.org/2007/12/30/plug-in-development-workflow/comment-page-1/#comment-575</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Aniszczyk (zx)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 19:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aniszczyk.org/2007/12/30/plug-in-development-workflow/#comment-575</guid>
		<description>It all depends on your workflow :)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;m a fan of test-driven development but to a certain extent. I&#039;m almost a realist and writing all your tests before you write any &quot;business code&quot; is just crazy. I say do a mix of both with eclmma mixed in and you&#039;ll have your code coverage on the fly and fill in the blanks when the time comes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It all depends on your workflow <img src='http://aniszczyk.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;m a fan of test-driven development but to a certain extent. I&#8217;m almost a realist and writing all your tests before you write any &#8220;business code&#8221; is just crazy. I say do a mix of both with eclmma mixed in and you&#8217;ll have your code coverage on the fly and fill in the blanks when the time comes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Aniszczyk (zx)</title>
		<link>http://aniszczyk.org/2007/12/30/plug-in-development-workflow/comment-page-1/#comment-2667</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Aniszczyk (zx)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 19:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aniszczyk.org/2007/12/30/plug-in-development-workflow/#comment-2667</guid>
		<description>It all depends on your workflow :)I&#039;m a fan of test-driven development but to a certain extent. I&#039;m almost a realist and writing all your tests before you write any &quot;business code&quot; is just crazy. I say do a mix of both with eclmma mixed in and you&#039;ll have your code coverage on the fly and fill in the blanks when the time comes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It all depends on your workflow <img src='http://aniszczyk.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> I&#8217;m a fan of test-driven development but to a certain extent. I&#8217;m almost a realist and writing all your tests before you write any &#8220;business code&#8221; is just crazy. I say do a mix of both with eclmma mixed in and you&#8217;ll have your code coverage on the fly and fill in the blanks when the time comes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asimismo</title>
		<link>http://aniszczyk.org/2007/12/30/plug-in-development-workflow/comment-page-1/#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>asimismo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 18:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aniszczyk.org/2007/12/30/plug-in-development-workflow/#comment-574</guid>
		<description>Chris, it seems there&#039;s a mistake in your diagram. The test step is supposed to come before you write the Java code. Or, more clearly, writing the test comes before writing the Java code.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, it seems there&#8217;s a mistake in your diagram. The test step is supposed to come before you write the Java code. Or, more clearly, writing the test comes before writing the Java code.</p>
<p> <img src='http://aniszczyk.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asimismo</title>
		<link>http://aniszczyk.org/2007/12/30/plug-in-development-workflow/comment-page-1/#comment-2666</link>
		<dc:creator>asimismo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 18:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aniszczyk.org/2007/12/30/plug-in-development-workflow/#comment-2666</guid>
		<description>Chris, it seems there&#039;s a mistake in your diagram. The test step is supposed to come before you write the Java code. Or, more clearly, writing the test comes before writing the Java code.;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, it seems there&#8217;s a mistake in your diagram. The test step is supposed to come before you write the Java code. Or, more clearly, writing the test comes before writing the Java code.;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

