Comments on: Austin Eclipse DemoCamp Recap http://aniszczyk.org/2008/11/13/austin-eclipse-democamp-recap/ work. life. open source. diatribes. Mon, 14 May 2012 23:38:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Donald Smith http://aniszczyk.org/2008/11/13/austin-eclipse-democamp-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-924 Donald Smith Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:40:00 +0000 http://aniszczyk.org/2008/11/13/austin-eclipse-democamp-recap/#comment-924 Hi Lee Ann,<br/><br/>can you shoot me a mail, it's my first dot last name and at eclipse.org.<br/><br/> - Don Hi Lee Ann,

can you shoot me a mail, it’s my first dot last name and at eclipse.org.

– Don

]]> By: Donald Smith http://aniszczyk.org/2008/11/13/austin-eclipse-democamp-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-3009 Donald Smith Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:40:00 +0000 http://aniszczyk.org/2008/11/13/austin-eclipse-democamp-recap/#comment-3009 Hi Lee Ann,can you shoot me a mail, it's my first dot last name and at eclipse.org. - Don Hi Lee Ann,can you shoot me a mail, it’s my first dot last name and at eclipse.org. – Don

]]> By: Lee Anne http://aniszczyk.org/2008/11/13/austin-eclipse-democamp-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-922 Lee Anne Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:16:00 +0000 http://aniszczyk.org/2008/11/13/austin-eclipse-democamp-recap/#comment-922 Hey, did you get any video of Donald Smith's "What is Eclipse?" talk that you can post on the Web? I keep running into people who ask "what is Eclipse?" who really ought to know. :-) Hey, did you get any video of Donald Smith’s “What is Eclipse?” talk that you can post on the Web? I keep running into people who ask “what is Eclipse?” who really ought to know. :-)

]]> By: Lee Anne http://aniszczyk.org/2008/11/13/austin-eclipse-democamp-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-3008 Lee Anne Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:16:00 +0000 http://aniszczyk.org/2008/11/13/austin-eclipse-democamp-recap/#comment-3008 Hey, did you get any video of Donald Smith's "What is Eclipse?" talk that you can post on the Web? I keep running into people who ask "what is Eclipse?" who really ought to know. :-) Hey, did you get any video of Donald Smith’s “What is Eclipse?” talk that you can post on the Web? I keep running into people who ask “what is Eclipse?” who really ought to know. :-)

]]> By: Neil Bartlett http://aniszczyk.org/2008/11/13/austin-eclipse-democamp-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-920 Neil Bartlett Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:17:00 +0000 http://aniszczyk.org/2008/11/13/austin-eclipse-democamp-recap/#comment-920 The nested frameworks thing makes sense in theory. One of the problems with services is that they live in a single flat space, which doesn't scale if you have a LOT of them. Or you might want to have a set of services that are private to an "application". So, various people have asked for some way to partition this space, and nesting the whole OSGi framework is actually a surprisingly elegant way of achieving this because it avoids adding lots of special cases to the spec. The nested frameworks thing makes sense in theory. One of the problems with services is that they live in a single flat space, which doesn’t scale if you have a LOT of them. Or you might want to have a set of services that are private to an “application”. So, various people have asked for some way to partition this space, and nesting the whole OSGi framework is actually a surprisingly elegant way of achieving this because it avoids adding lots of special cases to the spec.

]]> By: Neil Bartlett http://aniszczyk.org/2008/11/13/austin-eclipse-democamp-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-3007 Neil Bartlett Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:17:00 +0000 http://aniszczyk.org/2008/11/13/austin-eclipse-democamp-recap/#comment-3007 The nested frameworks thing makes sense in theory. One of the problems with services is that they live in a single flat space, which doesn't scale if you have a LOT of them. Or you might want to have a set of services that are private to an "application". So, various people have asked for some way to partition this space, and nesting the whole OSGi framework is actually a surprisingly elegant way of achieving this because it avoids adding lots of special cases to the spec. The nested frameworks thing makes sense in theory. One of the problems with services is that they live in a single flat space, which doesn’t scale if you have a LOT of them. Or you might want to have a set of services that are private to an “application”. So, various people have asked for some way to partition this space, and nesting the whole OSGi framework is actually a surprisingly elegant way of achieving this because it avoids adding lots of special cases to the spec.

]]>