Comments on: {F}CKEditor http://aniszczyk.org/2009/11/05/fckeditor/ work. life. open source. diatribes. Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:01:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Daniel http://aniszczyk.org/2009/11/05/fckeditor/comment-page-1/#comment-1407 Daniel Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:06:34 +0000 http://aniszczyk.org/?p=1395#comment-1407 > Wonder why they changed the name :) ? Maybe also because of http://www.fck.de/ . At least that was my first association... before the other one... :) > Wonder why they changed the name :) ?

Maybe also because of http://www.fck.de/ . At least that was my first association… before the other one… :)

]]> By: Daniel http://aniszczyk.org/2009/11/05/fckeditor/comment-page-1/#comment-3146 Daniel Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:06:00 +0000 http://aniszczyk.org/?p=1395#comment-3146 > Wonder why they changed the name :) ? Maybe also because of http://www.fck.de/ . At least that was my first association... before the other one... :) > Wonder why they changed the name :) ?

Maybe also because of http://www.fck.de/ . At least that was my first association… before the other one… :)

]]> By: Chris Aniszczyk http://aniszczyk.org/2009/11/05/fckeditor/comment-page-1/#comment-1406 Chris Aniszczyk Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:35:46 +0000 http://aniszczyk.org/?p=1395#comment-1406 Anonymous, it's still crazy. Mozilla's <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/license-policy.html" rel="nofollow">licensing policy</a> is crazy too. They might as well release it under public domain or one license. License proliferation in open source isn't helping us, it is helping lawyers though :) Anonymous, it’s still crazy. Mozilla’s licensing policy is crazy too.

They might as well release it under public domain or one license. License proliferation in open source isn’t helping us, it is helping lawyers though :)

]]> By: Chris Aniszczyk http://aniszczyk.org/2009/11/05/fckeditor/comment-page-1/#comment-3145 Chris Aniszczyk Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:35:00 +0000 http://aniszczyk.org/?p=1395#comment-3145 Anonymous, it's still crazy. Mozilla's <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/license-policy.html" rel="nofollow">licensing policy</a> is crazy too. They might as well release it under public domain or one license. License proliferation in open source isn't helping us, it is helping lawyers though :) Anonymous, it’s still crazy. Mozilla’s licensing policy is crazy too.

They might as well release it under public domain or one license. License proliferation in open source isn’t helping us, it is helping lawyers though :)

]]> By: Anonymous http://aniszczyk.org/2009/11/05/fckeditor/comment-page-1/#comment-1405 Anonymous Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:19:24 +0000 http://aniszczyk.org/?p=1395#comment-1405 not sure what you mean by impressive licensing scheme, but tri-licensing on GPL/LGPL/MPL is also used for all Mozilla code. not sure what you mean by impressive licensing scheme, but tri-licensing on GPL/LGPL/MPL is also used for all Mozilla code.

]]> By: Anonymous http://aniszczyk.org/2009/11/05/fckeditor/comment-page-1/#comment-3144 Anonymous Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:19:00 +0000 http://aniszczyk.org/?p=1395#comment-3144 not sure what you mean by impressive licensing scheme, but tri-licensing on GPL/LGPL/MPL is also used for all Mozilla code. not sure what you mean by impressive licensing scheme, but tri-licensing on GPL/LGPL/MPL is also used for all Mozilla code.

]]> By: oisin http://aniszczyk.org/2009/11/05/fckeditor/comment-page-1/#comment-1404 oisin Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:13:34 +0000 http://aniszczyk.org/?p=1395#comment-1404 Roll on the WTFPL. Roll on the WTFPL.

]]> By: oisin http://aniszczyk.org/2009/11/05/fckeditor/comment-page-1/#comment-3143 oisin Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:13:00 +0000 http://aniszczyk.org/?p=1395#comment-3143 Roll on the WTFPL. Roll on the WTFPL.

]]>